Предприниматель: профиль личности и карьерные предпочтения
Аннотация
Статья посвящена характеристике профиля личности и карьерных предпочтений, включая индивидуальные различия жизненных установок, профессиональных интересов, трудовой мотивации, структуры интеллекта и личности, молодежи с типом карьеры Предпринимательский, профессиональным интересом и вектором карьерного развития Предприниматель (данные профтестирования, полученные с помощью диагностического компьютерного комплекса «Профкарьера», сравнительного и корреляционного анализа, n=239).
Специфика личности предпринимателя связана с мотивацией, карьерными предпочтениями и личностными особенностями. Предприниматели – это активные, целеустремленные люди, характеризующиеся открытостью, готовностью к неопределенности и преодолению трудностей, стремящиеся к развитию, инновациям и творчеству. Полученные результаты согласуются с выводами исследований о предпринимателях как гибких, открытых новому опыту личностях, ориентированных на достижения и рост.
Ключевые слова
Полный текст:
PDFЛитература
Obschonka M., Lee N., Rodríguez-Pose A., Eichstaedt J.C., & Ebert T. Big data methods, social media, and the psychology of entrepreneurial regions: capturing cross-county per-sonality traits and their impact on entrepreneurship in the USA. Small Business Econom-ics, 2020, no 55(3), pp. 567-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00204-2.
Obschonka M., Zhou M., Zhou Y., Zhang J., & Silbereisen R.K. “Confucian” traits, entre-preneurial personality, and entrepreneurship in China: a regional analysis. Small Business Economics, 2019, no 53(4), pp. 961-979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0103-8.
Obschonka M., Andersson H., Silbereisen R.K., & Sverke M. (2013a). Rule-breaking, crime, and entrepreneurship: a replication and extension study with 37-year longitudinal data. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2013a, no 83(3), pp. 386-396.
Obschonka M., Schmitt-Rodermund E., Silbereisen, R.K., Gosling S.D., & Potter J. The re-gional distribution and correlates of an entrepreneurship-prone personality pro-file in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom: a socioecological perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2013b, no 105(1), pp. 104-122.
Obschonka M., Stuetzer M., Gosling S.D., Rentfrow P.J., Lamb M.E., Potter J., & Audretsch, D.B. Entrepreneurial regions: do macro-psychological cultural characteristics of regions help solve the “knowledge paradox” of economics? PLoS One, 2015, no 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129332.
Obschonka M., Stuetzer M., Audretsch D.B., Rentfrow P.J., Potter J., & Gosling S.D. Ma-cropsychological factors predict regional economic resilience during a major economic crisis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2016, no 7(2), pp. 95-104.
Богатырева К.А., Широкова Г.В. (2017). От предпринимательских намерений – к со-зданию бизнеса: опыт российских студентов. Форсайт, 2017, №11 (3), cc. 25-36. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.3.25.36. [Bogatyreva K.A., Shirokova G.V. Ot predprinimatel'skih namerenij – k sozdaniju biznesa: opyt rossijskih studentov [From En-trepreneurial Aspirations to Founding a Business: The Case of Russian Students]. Forsajt – Foresight, 2017, no. 11 (3), pp. 25-36].
Ahmed S.U. nAch, risk-taking propensity, locus of control and entrepreneurship. Personali-ty and Individual Differences, 1985, no 6(6), pp. 781–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90092-3.
Stewart W.H. & Roth P.L. Data Quality Affects Meta-Analytic Conclusions:
A Response to Miner and Raju (2004) Concerning Entrepreneurial Risk Propensity. Jour-nal of Applied Psychology, 2004, no 89(1), pp. 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.14.
Stewart W.H. & Roth P.L. Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and man-agers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001,
no 86(1), pp. 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.145.
Ahn T. (2010). Attitudes toward risk and self-employment of young workers. Labour Economics, 2010, no 17(2), pp. 434–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2009.06.005.
Korhonen M., Komulainen K. & Räty H. “Not Everyone is Cut Out to be the Entrepre-neur Type”: How Finnish School Teachers Construct the Meaning of Entrepreneurship Education and the Related Abilities of the Pupils. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2012, no 56(1), pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.567393.
Barber D. An experimental analysis of risk and entrepreneurial attitudes of university students in the USA and Brazil. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2015, no 13(4), pp. 370-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-015-0161-9.
Шумпетер Й. Теория экономического развития: Исследование предприниматель-ской прибыли, капитала, кредита, процента и цикла конъюнктуры. М.: Прогресс, 1982. 455 с. [Shumpeter I. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: Issledovanie predprini-matel'skoi pribyli, kapitala, kredita, protsenta i tsikla kon"yunktury [The theory of eco-nomic development: the study of entrepreneurial profit, capital, credit, interest and the cycle of conjuncture]. Moscow, Progress, 1982. 455 p.].
Douglas E.J. & Fitzsimmons J.R. Intrapreneurial intentions versus entrepreneurial inten-tions: distinct constructs with different antecedents. Small Business Economics, 2013, no 41(1), pp. 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9419-y.
Hsieh C., Parker S.C. & van Praag C.M. Risk, balanced skills and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 2017, no 48(2), pp. 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9785-y.
Yurtkoru E.S., Acar P. & Teraman B.S. Willingness to Take Risk and Entrepreneurial In-tention of University Students: An Empirical Study Comparing Private and State Univer-sities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, no 150, pp. 834–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.092.
Karimi S., Biemans H.J.A., Naderi Mahdei K., Lans T., Chizari M. & Mulder M. Testing the relationship between personality characteristics, contextual factors and entrepreneur-ial intentions in a developing country. International Journal of Psychology, 2017, no 52(3), pp. 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12209.
MacKo A. & Tyszka T. Entrepreneurship and risk taking. Applied Psychology, 2009, no 58(3), pp. 469-487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00402.x.
Palich L.E. & Bagby D. Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 1995, Vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 425-438.
Norton W.I. & Moore W.T. (2006). The influence of entrepreneurial risk assessment on venture launch or growth decisions. Small Business Economics, 2006, no 26(3), pp. 215-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-004-5612-y.
Cho Y.H. & Lee J.-H. Entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial education and perfor-mance. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2018, no 12(2), pp. 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-05-2018-0028.
Brockner J., Higgins E.T. & Low M.B. Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 2004, 19(2), pp. 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00007-7.
Baron R. A. Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 1998, no 13(4), pp. 275-294.
Krueger N.F., Reilly M.D., Carsrud A.L. Competing Models of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 2000, vol. 15, no. 5/6, pp. 411-432.
Shane S. and Venkataraman S. The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 2000, no 25, pp. 217-226.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611.
Narayanasamy K., Rasiah D., & Jacobs C.J. An Empirical Study of Factors Influencing Gender Differences In Entrepreneurship. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 2011, no 10 (10), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v10i10.5976.
Shinnar R., Giacomin O. & Janssen F. (2012). Entrepreneurial perceptions and intentions: The role of gender and culture. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 2012, no 36(3), pp. 465-493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00509.x.
Zhang S.X. & Cueto J. The Study of Bias in Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 2017, no 41(3), pp. 419-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12212.
Mitchell R.K., Busenitz L., Lant T., McDougall P.P., Morse E. A., & Smith J.B. (2002). Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Cognition: Rethinking the People Side of Entrepre-neurship Research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 2002, no 27(2), pp. 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00001.
Foo M. der. Emotions and Entrepreneurial Opportunity Evaluation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 2011, no 35(2), pp. 375-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00357.x.
Cacciotti G. & Hayton J.C. Fear and entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2015, no 17(2), pp. 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12052.
Методическое пособие по комплексу «Профкарьера». М.: ООО ЦТР «Гуманитар-ные технологии». URL: https://docplayer.com/29514763-Metodicheskoe-posobie-po-kompleksu-profkarera.html [Metodicheskoe posobie po kompleksu “Profkar'era”. [Me-thodical manual on the complex “Professional career”]. Moscow, Testing Center “Hu-manitarian technologies”].
Профкарьера Maintest® - система онлайн-сервисов. URL: https://ctr.maintest.ru/maintest-5i/?testing=9e6543d3225ff8e5 [Profkar'era –sistema onlain-servisov [Professional Career Maintest ® – online services system]].
Наследов А.Д. Математические методы психологического исследования. Анализ и интерпретация данных. СПб.: Речь, 2004. 392 с. [Nasledov A.D. Matematicheskie metody psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya [Mathematical methods of psychological re-search. Data analysis and interpretation]. SPb., Rech' Publ, 2004. 392 p.].
Сидоренко Е.В. Методы математической обработки в психологии. СПб.: ООО «Речь», 2000. 350 с. [Sidorenko E.V. Metody matematicheskoj obrabotki v psihologii [Methods of mathematical processing in psychology]. SPb., Rech' Publ. 350 p.].
Mueller S.L. and Thomas A.S. Culture and Entrepreneurial Potential: A Nine Country Study of Locus of Control and Innovativeness. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship, 2000. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1510994.
Cho Y.H. & Lee J.-H. Entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial education and perfor-mance. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2018, no 12(2), pp. 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-05-2018-0028.
Smith C.A., Konik J. Who is satisfied with life? Personality, cognitive flexibility, and life satisfaction. Current Psychology, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01359-6.
Murdock K.W., Oddi K.B., Bridgett D.J. Cognitive correlates of personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 2013, no 34(2), pp. 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000104.
Bygrave W.D. The Entrepreneurship Paradigm (I): A Philosophical Look at its Research Methodologies. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneur-ial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship, 1989. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1505870
Davidsson P., Wiklund J. Theoretical and Methodological Issues in the Study of Firm Growth. JIBS – Jonkoping International Business School Working Paper Series, 1999, 6, Retrieved: http://www.ihh.hj.se/eng/research/publications/wp/jibs_workingpaper1999.htm
Mitton D.G. The complete entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 1989, no 13(3), pp. 9-19.
Ferreira J.J., Raposo M.L., Rodrigues R.G., Dinis A. & Paço A. A model of entrepreneurial intention: An application of the psychological and behavioral approaches. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 2012, no 19(3), pp. 424-440.
Бубновская О.В., Гаффорова Е.Б., Леонидова В.В. Обзор предпринимательского потенциала студенчества на примере ДВФУ. Университетские образовательные программы как ресурс развития социального предпринимательства в регионе: ма-териалы Всероссийской научно-практической конференции с международным уча-стием (15-16 апреля 2021 г.). Ставрополь: Изд-во СКФУ, 2021, сс. 54-60. [Bub-novskaya O.V., Gafforova E.B., Leonidova V.V. Obzor predprinimatel'skogo potentsiala studenchestva na primere DVFU [Review of the Entrepreneurial Potential of the Students on the Example of FEFU]. Universitetskie obrazovatel'nye programmy kak resurs razvitiya sotsial'nogo predprinimatel'stva v regione: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem [University Educational Pro-grams as a Resource for the Development of Social Entrepreneurship in the Region] (15-16 aprelya 2021 g.). Stavropol': SKFU Publ, 2021, pp. 54-60].
(c) 2022 Научный журнал "Известия Дальневосточного федерального университета. Экономика и управление"
© Дальневосточный федеральный университет, 1996-2022.
© Научный журнал "Известия Дальневосточного федерального университета Экономика и управление" - 16+.
Свидетельство о регистрации средства массовой информации ПИ № ФС77-57575
Издатель - ФГАОУ ВО "Дальневосточный федеральный университет".
При перепечатке ссылка на Сайт Журнала обязательна.
Коммерческое использование размещенных материалов запрещено.
E-mail: sem-journal@dvfu.ru